| ▲ | nialv7 an hour ago | |||||||
Holy Dunning–Kruger effect... As a software developer, I am a much better doctor than actual trained doctors, and am definitely immune to any placebo effects. | ||||||||
| ▲ | LPisGood an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I don’t know anything about the specifics of this case. I do know there are lots of bad doctors. Doctors routinely make mistakes or overlook things, especially relatively trivial things like this. I don’t know what people think you learn in medical school that makes you an infallible source of health knowledge. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
| [deleted] | ||||||||
| ▲ | sadsach an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Trained doctors pushed opiates and benzos on me when they were very much not needed and in both cases led to dependancies and horrific withdrawals. I'm sure many others can chime in with their own similar experiences. Medical professionals are incredibly crucial to the wellbeing of society, but they have also been responsible for much suffering because they are human just like us. | ||||||||
| ▲ | dahart an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> Holy Dunning-Kruger effect… Do you know they’re wrong? Please don’t invoke Dunning Kruger like this, it’s cliché and also wrong to do. There’s no indicator for whatever it is Dunning & Kruger showed, you cannot know if it applies to a single person. Their main plot showed a positive correlation between confidence and competence. Their paper has problems, their methodology has been rightly questioned, and some attempts to reproduce have failed. Plus keep in mind that, ironically, for people who are intimately familiar with the debate over DK, using it to essentially name-call someone backfires and has the opposite of the intended effect, it makes the name caller look confidently ignorant. | ||||||||