| ▲ | throwaltman 6 hours ago | |
Posting from a throwaway so I don't get banned by either service A few weeks ago I asked both GPT and claude for strategies to build techniques to get my coding sessions discarded by pre-training filtering as being "low-quality" I don't like the idea of my sessions being trained on and I don't trust that either of them won't train based on just their pinkie promise I think almost everyone would agree that using a technique like this would be moral, given that both providers made those pinkie promises. I never asked the models for techniques to poison training data just make my sessions more likely to be removed during the data cleaning process. You can guess... both services refused something that I think the vast majority of people would think is ethical. This was pre Sonnet 5, but I suspect that doesn't change anything on claude's side. I then went to a non-frontier model hosted by a non-US provider and it happily agreed to help me! Anyways I've changed my focus. Anyone have strategies/ideas for building harnesses that generate fake sessions (or adjust real ones) to poison the training process? After all if someone swears to not train on your data then its completely harmless to them... | ||