| ▲ | semiquaver 4 hours ago | |
What you’re saying is entirely vibes-based. The actual data utterly contradicts your claim (see sibling). | ||
| ▲ | tclancy 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
I don't think so. It's strident and it may be eliding some details, but the idea is IPO shares are available to institutional investors first and that adds a tax for retail investors that is probably not worth paying. A suspicious mind might go so far as thinking the institutional investors don't necessarily care about the underlying metrics at IPO up to a certain number of shares: they know that whatever X opens at, they can get 1.25X for the shares immediately after. | ||