This is the wrong call, we should have gone for permanent standard time instead of this. Permanent DST was tried already in the 1970s and everyone in my parents’ generation tells me it was a complete and total disaster

▲

Ariarule 7 hours ago | parent | next [-]

1974 was over a half-century ago; it is extremely weak evidence with everything that's changed since then, at best.

	▲	davesque 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Not sure I follow. I can't imagine humanity has evolved much since 1974.
	▲	quuxplusone 6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permanent_time_observation_in_... Interestingly, DST itself had been standardized by the Uniform Time Act of 1966 less than a decade before that! IMHO seems like permanent standard time would have been the more logical route (apparently it could have been done at the state level under current federal laws), but "more logical" doesn't always mean "easier to accomplish."

▲

jsLavaGoat 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It shouldn't matter. If there are bad effects from lack of daylight regardless of number on wall, the schedule should be changed. Technology lets us do that and communicate about it a lot easier.

Just have winter hours if it affects you. Why can't we do that?