Remix.run Logo
jonhohle 4 hours ago

For the vast majority of things I need to power or charge, dumb USB charging is fine, and I have a 10-port Anker “IQ” charger that works great for most of those things. Why doesn’t the equivalent USB-C charger exist? I don’t need 65W on each port. I just needs lots of ports for gadgets that can trickle charge for hours at night (4 kids, lots of devices). I mostly want to standardize on USB-C host cables, but no one makes a cheap device for doing that more than a decade after USB-C became a thing.

tempest_ 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The reason is because while you want to use the low end the general public does not understand that USB-C is the connector only and that various levels of power and data depend on the cable and the device at both ends.

If you sell a 10 port USB-C charged someone is going to plug 10 MacBooks into it and complain it doesnt work.

The best I have seen for what you want is

https://ca.ugreen.com/products/ugreen-500w-desktop-charger

but is not cheap at all or something like

https://www.amazon.ca/Powered-Aluminum-Adapter-Computer-Prin...

rootusrootus 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've seen 1000W (or so they claim) 10 port USB-C chargers on Amazon. Not Anker, just a no name Chinese brand I am not going to trust. But they do seem to exist. Like the sibling comment says, I assume it's because people expect USB-C charging capabilities to be a lot higher.

benoau 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Why doesn’t the equivalent USB-C charger exist?

Isn't this just a USB 3.x hub?

jonhohle 4 hours ago | parent [-]

You know of a 10-port USB-C hub that can negotiate power (old USB style, not PD) without a host device?

TulliusCicero 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm guessing it's because people expect USB-C ports to at least handle 18w.