It’s just a short hop to not being able to see it at all. I started using pi.dev recently, the idea that a third party is taking more and more direct control of my software development process sits badly with me.

▲

32 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

dannyw 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

pi.dev is truly excellent. one of the great things about an openai sub is you still can take your subsidised tokens/usage, and choose your coding harness of choice (not against tos)

▲

embedding-shape 2 hours ago | parent [-]

pi is great as a quick and hackable TUI, or as a starting point for your own stuff. It's a far cry from Codex + Sol + Ultra though. Same goes for a lot of model+harness combos, the models are trained with data from harness usage, and (many) harnesses are built with specific models in mind, Sol will definitively perform better in Codex than in pi, because the way both parts were built.

	▲	dlarsen5 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I thought that too where the same model + harnesse would always be better but databricks found using pi actually could outperform with the same model. maybe evidence that the coupling premise may not be always true https://www.databricks.com/blog/benchmarking-coding-agents-d...