| ▲ | U of Chicago law school bans laptops from classes amid AI backlash(the-independent.com) |
| 30 points by smurda a day ago | 15 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | RandomRandy a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| I can understand banning laptops during exams, but why would you ban them in class? I was at a big university with pretty much all my classes having more than 100 students, so most of my lectures consisted of the prof presenting slides with little to no interaction from students. The only advantage of having a laptop was that you could annotate the slides easier |
| |
| ▲ | free_bip a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Agreed. If I'm attending higher education as an adult, I expect to be treated as one. Laptops may be harmful to learning for some students, but may be extremely helpful for others. The university is not the one who gets to decide that - the adult paying absurd sums of money to attend the class is. | |
| ▲ | spicymaki 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Large lectures (100+ students) should have little to no interactions between students and lecturers. It has been this way since the 11th century. You are not supposed to be learning the material for the first time during a lecture. Using the syllabus you should do the pre-work and the lecture concretizes the information. Office hours, tutoring, self study, homework, and online/AI resources can be used as tools to deepen your understanding of the material outside of the lecture hall. | | |
| ▲ | john01dav 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is a terrible way to learn. Lecture halls are uncomfortable and synchronous, which are objectively less convenient than reading or watching videos at home. If someone wants that then they can organize watch parties, without forcing it on anyone else. Synchronous and uncomfortable should be reserved for interactive things, like in a flipped classroom |
|
|
|
| ▲ | baggachipz a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Seems a little drastic; couldn't they simply block domains and forbid vpns? Throwing the baby out with the bathwater seems counter-productive when a laptop is so essential for modern classes (far as I can see, I went to school in the pre-laptop era). |
| |
| ▲ | xnyan a day ago | parent | next [-] | | You can only do that if the school completely controls the laptop. You have to have the professor be able to verify that the student was using an approved laptop each class period. Seems like a nonstarter to me. | | | |
| ▲ | stephenbez a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Students would just connect to their own hotspot and not have any restrictions. | | | |
| ▲ | shimman a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Laptops aren't essential for modern classes, laptops (in the true consumer sense of the world) have barely been a thing that students can easily afford for barely 20 years (more like 15 if we're being honest here). SV is going to learn that society is allowed to reject technology and the sun will still rise tomorrow. | | |
| ▲ | TheCycoONE a day ago | parent | next [-] | | About 20 years ago I learned if I took my laptop to class and typed my notes I didn't retain nearly as well as if I took a pen and notebook. I was in computer science in Canada and probably 5-10% of people brought laptops to class as far as I recall. A few people had to use the labs, but most students had their own computer or laptop at that time. | |
| ▲ | nisegami a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >SV is going to learn that society is allowed to reject technology and the sun will still rise tomorrow. The sun may still rise, but the stock market may not. | | |
| ▲ | shimman a day ago | parent [-] | | Good thing the vast majority of Americans do not prosper if American corporations do. Hence the need for redistributive efforts to improve the material lives of all Americans. |
| |
| ▲ | greenhat76 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Silicon Valley is indeed, disconnected from the reality of the world. |
| |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
