| ▲ | TeeWEE 2 hours ago | |
Basically it’s AI on top of AI for metadata extraction. There are a lot of claims in the article but not a lot of hard data. In the end they still don’t know if the data is correct. Good luck with your glutes allergy. The weird thing for me is the prompt optimization loop? Why not fine tune the model instead of AI generating the prompt? | ||
| ▲ | aix1 20 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Also, "healthy" as a boolean flag is, franky, a bit of a joke. | ||
| ▲ | IanCal 38 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> The weird thing for me is the prompt optimization loop? Why not fine tune the model instead of AI generating the prompt? Why is it weird to optimise the prompt? Whether you optimise the model is a separate issue. If you use any closed models you can’t fine tune them, which is another reason for most but here they also fine tuned models. | ||