| ▲ | nyrikki 2 hours ago | |
I almost got kicked off an early ISP for
On the shell host they provided, it would reliably hang up lots of modems if someone ‘fingered’ you back in the day. You could do it in busy IRC channels well onto the 2000’s and still see some people drop off line. | ||
| ▲ | ssl-3 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
That only works on modems that don't support the (patented) delay requirement betwixt +++ and a command that Hayes instituted...which was actually quite a large percentage of them by the time v.34 came 'round. Plus, the string needs to come from the DTE side of things (the user's local PC), not the remote end. So, with finger and IRC channels alike: The hack relies upon the ISP's modem to behave in that way, and not the end-user's. As a workaround for the latter, a person could encapsulate the string into payloads for ICMP pings. User's machine receives and responds to the ping, and this response packet hangs up their connection. As a way to weaponize that without things like IRC that leak WAN network addresses, a person could sometimes finger the target's ISP's terminal servers to see which users were logged into which ports and deduce the target's IP address from that. This way, the ping can show up before they even get back onto IRC. Going even further: Automation. (Going straight to jail: +++ATHD911) | ||
| ▲ | Scoundreller 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Similarly some AV software would “listen” to your IRC comms to check for c&c indicators which meant you could paste it into a channel and a pile of people would disconnect (and you’d be quickly banned). | ||