If the readme is anything to go by, this doesn't look like it was written by hand. Codex if I were to guess. I wonder the coding agent "improved" the code.

The readme hints at the prompt:

> It keeps the original system's semantics — what it does — while rethinking how it's expressed: stronger types, clearer module boundaries, idiomatic abstractions everywhere.

"idiomatic abstractions" would certainly bloat the line count.

▲

rtpg an hour ago | parent | next [-]

kinda sad cuz 10klines you really get into "well I can just sit there and bang at the problem by hand" territory.

Sounds like a fun project....

	▲	goalieca an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Linux at that point’s whole purpose was to bang at it by hand and learn something. There’s a ton of irony in having an LLM do it.

▲

pydry an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

so, slop