| ▲ | seydor 3 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
no, in fact gdpr requires that they get consent before they process the data. They are not preventing people from accessing the data, only indefinite storage as i understand. They may claim that storage is needed for the processing (which might make sense, they want to train on the whole time series). | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ptx 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Recital 11 of the GDPR says that consent must be "freely given", and recital 43 says (in part): "Consent is presumed not to be freely given if it does not allow separate consent to be given to different personal data processing operations despite it being appropriate in the individual case, or if the performance of a contract, including the provision of a service, is dependent on the consent despite such consent not being necessary for such performance." | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wolvoleo 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes but that consent must be given freely. There can't be undue pressure. Unfortunately this part is not well defined but it looks like the AI training part is not required to deliver the service to the specific user so I do think that if challenged it will be ruled afoul of GDPR. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | varispeed 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Indeed, gdpr was created for corporations to have legal basis to process and sell data. Before gdpr it was a gray area. It was never about privacy. | |||||||||||||||||||||||