| ▲ | semiquaver 3 hours ago | |
Pure sophistry, divorced from reality. It starts with the assumption that nothing coming from AI can be useful or trusted and uses that to demonstrate that AI is not useful or safe. | ||
| ▲ | llm_nerd 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |
Right at the outset it opines that AI finding vulnerabilities ("allegedly") is useless because people have to verify those vulnerabilities, which is such a logically braindead bit of nonsense that I knew it was going to be worthless, and somehow it got even worse with every subsequent paragraph. I get that there are people who are scared, and the change is coming fast and hard and there is a lot of doom and concerns, but good god do people think authoring or upvoting shit like the submitted nonsense is going to stem the tide or change the path? Pathetic. | ||