They may have, unfortunately, proved DOGE's point. The new climate.gov probably costs a fraction of the old one.

Simply hosting the website wasn't costing that much

ordersofmag 10 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nope. The main cost of the old climate.gov was the salaries of the folks writing the articles and pulling together the resources. They were not getting paid exorbitantly and are quite interested in still getting paid. Source: I am one of those people.

▲

hvb2 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's easy to do. No one has expectations of this one.

As soon as a government website is down, it's an outrage.

I'm sure money could've been saved. But the cost of this site really isn't the hosting, it's the data being gatherd with all the research

	▲	willmadden 31 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I would like to see climate research funded, but it needs to be de-politicized and stop being used to push fear propaganda and sinister policies. They used it to flat out destroy the economies in much of Europe, while somehow China and India were ignored despite being orders of magnitude bigger problems, according to their own narrative. If any of the above were honest, there would have been blanket trade restrictions and sanctions on China and India so quickly it would make your head spin.
	▲	redsocksfan45 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[dead]

▲

iAMkenough 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That's the Republican M.O.

Strangle funding to a public service, complain that public service isn't performing, use the consequences of their own actions to justify eliminating the public service indefinitely.