Yes! We could pool our efforts though, in a larger organization (let's call it a democratic republic), vote on who should preside over it, be on the "board" and hire some people to run the day-to operations of the whole thing.

If a single organization proves too unwieldy, we could even have a federated solution.

Edit: another suggestion https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=48898415&goto=item%3Fi...

▲

hvb2 3 hours ago | parent [-]

This is the American way.

The end result? Judges being elected that nobody knows. Some even running unopposed. Yet, they all are 'elected'.

No. I don't think Americans can elect more people. I would be shocked if over 10% formed their own opinion on which judge to pick for example. If you're lucky they did that for the ballot measures...

	▲	pstuart 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> Judges being elected that nobody knows. I think this falls under "least worst option". I confess that I (and most others) don't have the time or focus to properly evaluate judicial candidates, so I turn to "trusted resources" to help guide my vote. It's easier to vote on higher level issues, like ballot propositions or state/federal representation. That said, the fact that a significant portion of the voting public voted in a man who epitomizes the most unqualified and inappropriate person into the US presidency has shaken my faith in democracy.