That doesn't seem controversial to me.

I wish the same were true of all federal organizations though. For example, CIA regulates itself with its own supervision too.

Other orgs do it too. I don't think they do it well.

▲

estearum 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> CIA regulates itself with its own supervision too

That's not true lol. There is a gigantic supervisory apparatus constantly breathing down the IC's neck, including but not limited to your very own elected Congressperson's investigative powers.

▲

mannanj 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Ah ok. Well I don't see it limiting their misconduct and behavior, do you?

▲

estearum 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, I do.

Perhaps you mean to say: I don't see it eliminating their misconduct and behavior.

▲

mannanj an hour ago | parent [-]

No I meant limit.

	▲	estearum an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Well then unfortunately you just have no clue what you’re talking about. The notion that the CIA is “not limited” by checks and balances is beyond laughable. How many people have you met who work there? Ever talked with someone about the limitations (or lack thereof) on their work? I will bet the answers are zero and no. Am I wrong?