| ▲ | bogwog 4 hours ago | |
So you're saying that it's not fair to rate a coding model on its ability to code, and instead the best way to use it is to tell it to find existing human-written code online rather than generate actual code on its own? | ||
| ▲ | dvt 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
If you're testing how good LLMs are at compressing information, then I think that's a fair test. Personally, I don't really think that's where their strength comes from (especially considering how much more useful local models that are orders of magnitude smaller than Claude/OpenAI-tier models have gotten). In other words, we already have a "super-intelligence"—it's called the internet, so just use the darn thing. | ||
| ▲ | 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | darkwater 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Isn't part of the human coding that Super Dario tells us LLM are going to replace also made of what you are saying GP is saying? | ||