| ▲ | thefunnyman 5 hours ago | |
I agree, I truly love logseq as it fits the way my brain works in a way the few other tools seem to be able to replicate. Unfortunately my notes being in plain text is a non-negotiable for me. This will probably be the push I need to transition over fully to org-roam. My logseq files are already stored in org format anyway. | ||
| ▲ | setopt 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I also went back to Org-mode some years ago (most recently via Howm-mode). I loved what Logseq had to offer, and setup monthly donations for a while, but after the long period of apparent stagnation I lost faith and jumped ship. It’s sad because Logseq felt like a more focused tool than either Emacs or Obsidian, and really nailed the UI/UX that I wanted. But the interface was slow and buggy, and both the Org and Markdown backends are sufficiently non-standard that I didn’t want to continue writing my notes in that unless I believe Logseq is going to be around for a while. And I’m not at all excited by the large investment in the database backend, given that being backed by plain text is their largest feature from my point of view. | ||
| ▲ | jauntywundrkind 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I'm somewhat willing to entertain the possibility of using FUSE to access my files again as such (as files), but man, what a downgrade! It also means the file based syncing I use is not going to work anymore, which... On the other hand... Is maybe right out for me. | ||