  do not have the money to invest in developing a camera system that is sovereignly owned by the city

That would render the city liable for handling the data which is already politically volatile. In America, if it's a commercial entity doing it then there is no liability and you can just fold the company if something bad happens.

▲ vablings 8 hours ago | parent [-]

Well according to Flock, the data is actually owned by the city and they are already responsible. This is just private sector loopholing

	▲	bigbuppo 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		And in reality, it's a handwave. The city will refer you to Flock, and then Flock will cancel the contract, but leave the cameras up, so now there's no customer. Funny that.