| ▲ | kortilla a day ago | |
I think the problem is that people are allowed to set up cameras of public spaces without requiring any “license to surveil”. | ||
| ▲ | nemomarx a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
are they on land flock owns though? I don't think I could go put up a camera on city infrastructure like traffic lights without their permission. does flock buy a lot of little permissions to install and power their cameras or something? | ||
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
I assure you that if I slapped a camera on city infrastructure they would absolutely find some license or permission that I don't have and threaten me with a million+ dollar fine over it. | ||
| ▲ | logancbrown a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Making recording in public require a license is a very easy way to cut free speech and document wrong-doing of a system. | ||