Remix.run Logo
skybrian 4 days ago

Yes, but it’s up to their competitors to build competing services.

cryo32 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

I think it's up to their customers not to encourage consolidation.

grim_io 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Microsoft is the proof that customers do want that, or that they don't have a real choice.

cryo32 4 days ago | parent [-]

I think it's simpler - they don't give a crap.

Until somewhere down the line. Like when half of Spain gets cut off due to an arbitrary block on a consolidated service facade...

Tade0 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Customers shouldn't have to micromanage every service and product like that.

We have antitrust regulations for such things.

Catloafdev 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What Cloudflare competitors offer a similar range of services?

owenthejumper 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Akamai, Fastly, HAProxy, F5, many others? Talking about bots specifically, not about "workers" etc.

cute_boi 3 days ago | parent [-]

Akamai is nightmare, they block many user mercilessly. They are worst than Akamai. I don't see issue with other though.

cryo32 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Do you really need Cloudflare's services to run your business?

Catloafdev 4 days ago | parent [-]

Are you genuinely asking "does anybody even need any of their services"?

yjftsjthsd-h 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

You said "a similar range of services". Basic DDoS protection is probably important, and there are other companies doing that. Beyond that, it's less obvious.

cryo32 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes. I am asking exactly that objective question.

They are advantageous to leverage in certain situations but essential they are not. We're used to, in the technology industry, looking for or creating problems to solve with services we are aware of. Moving back to necessity and need, do we really? Are we being objective? Most of the time, no.

dpoloncsak 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Theres a few alternatives, but at a minimum yes you probably need their or a competitor's Name Servers and their public DNS. Rolling your own isn't very feasible.

fragmede 4 days ago | parent [-]

DNS hosting is easy if you did want to roll your own, but everyone one does it, especially your registrar. The more sticky bits of Cloudflare are their cloud services, specifically compute (workers) and database and object storage, all wrapped up into a convenient product (Pages). Also their identity and VPN stuff. They've come a long way since just doing DDoS protection/being a CDN.

Catloafdev 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

DDoS protection is pretty essential. I highly encourage you to read through what they offer if you're not familiar.

4 days ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
skybrian 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

That too, but they need competitors to switch to.

shimman 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

No, it's up to the people to regulate tech companies into submission.