| ▲ | JR1427 15 hours ago | |||||||
What are the advantages to putting them between the rails, where you need trains to stop running in order to access them? If it's about using wasted land, why not put them beside the rails, which would make access easier? There is usually a generous margin beside the tracks. This would also allow bigger panels to be used. | ||||||||
| ▲ | alnwlsn 15 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I think the idea is that you can make a machine that goes on the rails and installs them automatically. So you don't need to haul a bunch of equipment on site, you just drive one special train down the track once. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | red-iron-pine 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
"generous margin beside the tracks" is being, well, generous. there often isn't that much space, and it often already has cabling, phoneline, pipes, or other stuff there. augur cars overturn the soil and lay pipe but now the fiber optic lines would compete with the solar. meanwhile track lines are untapped, and often use electricity or having wiring for local induction loop | ||||||||
| ▲ | foxyv 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
I think the biggest advantage rails have is that they are electrified and are accessible by rail based maintenance vehicles. Panels have gotten so inexpensive that the major cost is usually the mounting, installation, and electrical access. Some of that is mitigated by installing on railways. You can automate the installation process and connect into the tram lines. | ||||||||