| ▲ | swiftcoder 21 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> it seems like a group of people expect us to be Photoshop and another group expects us to be MS Paint - and making one group happy (non-destructive editing, for instance) annoys the other group This feels like it would behoove the project to pick a lane and tell the users which one of these it is supposed to be. You have a worse experience for all by trying to keep both camps happy, and also ceding one of these verticals would open up mindshare for another open-source project to step in and cover that instead | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cmyk_student 21 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
We do - we state exactly what GIMP is and what we aim for. That doesn't stop people from having their own conceptions. The "more like MS Paint" group tends to be longtime users who often prefer the destructive editing approach of GIMP 2. We try to respect people who currently use the software, while also trying to implement new features as intended on the roadmap. Given the number of great open source art programs today, I don't think we're keeping anyone from doing anything. :) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||