People in the climate movement are rarely professional PR folks. Weaponizing their personal faults against the objective subject matter they talk about is disingenuous anyway?

You cannot deduce factual correctness from how "holy" the messenger is.

▲

strken an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Wanting every living human being to die and our species to go extinct ("NTHE" stands for "near-term human extinction") is a little beyond not being professional PR folks.

▲

inigyou an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It reads to me as a prediction, not a desire: if we don't prevent NTHE then NTHE will happen.

	▲	strken 16 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		In the context of "I want the human cancer gone from this planet" and the rest of that blog post, I am confident that it's a desire. Probably a desire for a peaceful fading out of the human species rather than a violent one, but it's still far beyond PR naivety.

▲

birksherty 36 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

It's humans who are doing this to themself and every other species on earth. So it's true.

▲

ablation 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I wasn't aware I had weaponised their personal faults, or indeed claimed that what they said was indicative of being a personal fault. I read his post, and then read some more of his writing, and simply felt it would be worth posting what I read in this thread. For me at least, it was a useful experience that changed some of what I was reading into the commentary surrounding the data. YMMV.