Remix.run Logo
EU will seek to limit children's access to social media(rte.ie)
9 points by austinallegro 5 hours ago | 18 comments
unicornops an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I've noticed the first few comments on here are not ok with social media access being restricted based on age. I can't say it sits well with me either both as a parent and as someone who spent a bunch of those early years on IRC. I get that current social media isn't like IRC/Usenet but...we do need something that is.

I think it would be better to instruct what the kids can and cannot see in social media rather than this age based blanket ban. In the same way we have with movies and video games we could have age ratings and then give the parents control over what child account can see what content and define how the algorithms get to work for specific age groups.

I expect we are going to see swings one way and another in the following years.

movedx01 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why not restrict the addictive design of the algorithms instead? No need to blanket ban social media access if the social media cannot optimize to steal every last inch of their attention. Anything on the feed becomes opt-in only and no engagement data coming from the user or from the outside can be used to optimize it, thats it. Control is back in the hands of the content consumer, parental restrictions become trivial, no black box algorithm deciding what bubbles up and what gets buried deep down.

emsign an hour ago | parent [-]

Because Meta lobbyied massively for this version of the law. So they keep their addictive apps as they are.

goobatrooba 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have mixed feelings about this.

On the one hand it clearly is necessary - we expect parents to do this but most are obviously failing (and I say this being a parent myself). Look what any 13 year old is doing on their phone or what disgusting horrors they encounter on the abyss of tiktok or Roblox.

On the other hand the means available to block access are too crude and seem to impinge on everyone's privacy. A shopkeeper checking the age to sell alcohol can look at your face, but an app cannot - so the solutions all seem to resort to quite invasive age checks.

I saw this related EU initiative a few weeks ago (also on HN) which seems to try to find a middle ground where you have to authorise ones and then can simply prove you are 18 without revealing any private info, but I do wonder how this holds up in practice - will the most-in-need-of-protection kids not simply get an adult to do a one-off signup for them?

https://www.euronews.com/next/2026/04/30/what-to-know-about-...

wtfHN26 2 hours ago | parent [-]

> A shopkeeper checking the age to sell alcohol can look at your face, but an app cannot - so the solutions all seem to resort to quite invasive age checks.

Don't give them ideas for scanning your face to check content.

vrighter an hour ago | parent [-]

didn't some platforms already do this?

bureaucrap 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The last generation with access to social media.

Only government opinion channels are allowed.

daveyyyy 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This feels strange. Social media is already a central part of modern life

OKRainbowKid 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

How is it strange? As far as I know, there's quite some research on negative impact of social media on teens mental health. How is restricting access to specific age groups fundamentally different from restricting access to cigarettes or alcohol?

alexgoodhart 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Because speech and communication obviously. That’s a ridiculous comparison.

I am very much not a pro-social media person (this is a social media website, btw) but I am even less a nanny state person. EU loses plenty of support from the citizens of its constituent states when it implements these sorts of limitations, so I hope the benefits meaningfully improve quality of life.

Also, research is not a prescriptive cure, and it isn’t a neutral domain. It is valuable, but not as an unevaluated rubber stamp.

OKRainbowKid 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It's not a ridiculous comparison in a world where Meta faces a 1.4T lawsuit over their core platform design being addictive to young people. And that lawsuit isn't brought by the EU, but by US states. So clearly there is more to it than "EU nanny state bad, US wild west good". https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/meta-meta-...

Chu4eeno 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Didn't the testifying UK academics explicitly say the current research was inconclusive?

bushwart 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You don't need to show your government ID to enter a supermarket.

OKRainbowKid 4 hours ago | parent [-]

And you don't need it to access the internet either.

_aavaa_ 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So was alcohol.

The problem is doing it in a way that doesn’t removal all privacy.

muteor an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It’s all stupid, they said the same things about radio, rock music, heavy metal, mtv, tv, books etc.

The research they quote is not conclusive and probably paid for by the age verification groups.

So it is either mass hysteria or a conspiracy.

062570864389 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

*Corrupt regime will restrict access to the Internet further, under the pretense of "protecting the children"

OKRainbowKid 5 hours ago | parent [-]

So did you just reframe the headline to match your own sentiment on that issue, or is there more substance to your comment?