> I didn’t say the other wasn’t technical.

What was the technical parts of Zig's post that made you leave with a negative opinion of Zig then? Something doesn't add up here.

The technical content of the Andrew’s post didn’t leave me with a negative opinion. To quote my original comment:

> When I read the post, my first thought was that I wouldn’t want to build things in Zig, because any technical decision I make, good or bad, might subject me to this kind of article from their BDFL. I can’t conceive of the leadership of the Python or Rust or any other community I’ve ever worked with doing something like that.

This is the negative opinion in question.