| ▲ | rajnathani 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I would rename the title to “The Buffett Indicator shows an overvalued market”. For those curious of its definition (from the article): > The Buffett Indicator, a ratio that measures the market cap of the entire stock market against the GDP of the United States, has hit a record of ~232%. Historically, anything above ~120% is a signal of the market being overvalued. That being said, it’s not clear that the Buffet Indicator is fully relevant, as a lot of the US AI and AI hardware companies’ market caps which are driving the stock market valuation growth involve a significant portion of their revenue from outside the US, and thus this wouldn’t necessarily count fully to the US’s GDP (for example, tax entity workarounds for foreign obtained revenue). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | le-mark 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The fact the AI emperor wears no clothes seems clear to me at least. The dot-com bubble looked obvious in 1997; it popped in 2000. Anyone shorting in '97-'98 was carried out on a stretcher before being vindicated. In fact 2000-2002 fell in three brutal legs over two years, and anyone who leveraged up after the first 25% leg was destroyed by the next two. My strat is to accumulate cash to buy the drop. The danger with this is; will the bubble continue until the bottom is even higher than today? I’ll take that bet. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mdemare 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Buffett indicator has been over 120% since December 2016. It dipped to 130% in March 2020. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||