I use AI myself so I definitely know how it tends to write. When I encounter that kind of writing somewhere, I initially give it the benefit of the doubt and continue a bit. But when the signs get too obvious, I tend to just stop reading.

It feels like the prompter is trying to trick me. They might for example have some simple agenda but they're trying to dress it up as some objective rational analysis with the help AI.

It would work better if the author told how the content was created, and even shared the prompt.

Yes, sometimes, and they do not notice because I proofread and edit to remove the worst AI markers and insert my own voice in there.