If what people here say is right, and AI usage online is growing and accelerating, then by the end of the year, the vast, vast majority articles posted to the internet (and linked by HN readers) are going to be AI slop, at which point it is not going to matter. "This article is AI" is going to add about as much insight to the conversation as "The author used a spell checker."

▲

archagon 4 hours ago | parent [-]

A good link aggregator should strive to select the <1% of articles that are actually high quality. Who cares what “everyone” is doing?

▲

pixl97 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Isn't that what the vote system is? If the users are selecting low quality then what exactly?

	▲	sph 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Then we are fucked. A quality platform must strive for more quality than what the average lurker, likely a bot, decides is worth reading. That’s how you get modern Reddit. Is the goal of this site to remain high-quality, or to rely on random, anonymous users to discern quality? Consider the possibility that the two options might be incompatible.