| ▲ | smallerfish 4 hours ago | |||||||
The voting system could be enough if downvoting was added. AI writing is not the problem - low effort is the problem. Low effort AI articles are full of tics which are obvious, if you've done a lot of AI writing. To write well with AI you need to spend a good deal of time editing. If you submit something that's low effort but has a clickbait headline that appeals to HN, you may well make the front page even if the article is lightweight (it does happen!) This is true both for AI and for human written articles. On the flip side, somebody could spend an enormous amount of effort creating a masterpiece with AI. Penalizing that because of the tool that was used is arbitrary. | ||||||||
| ▲ | awllau 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I was thinking the same. A lot of people use AI to refine their writing and make it more concise. I do think the dead giveaways (em dashes, it's not X it's Y, etc.) are annoying to come across repeatedly. A person not bothering to remove these tells feels 'low effort' to me. | ||||||||
| ▲ | fuckaiwriter 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Nope, AI writing itself is the problem for me. I don’t care if it is gold. If it is AI, I don’t want it. Same like kosher or vegetarian labels. Label it. | ||||||||
| ||||||||