I'm of the deepest conviction AI-generated text should not show up at all. Proving that however can be difficult (obvious LLM tells aside). Requiring evidence of authentic human authorship is also difficult, though increasingly I lean towards communities where that is a given for any legitimate shares.

▲

ldoughty 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What qualifies as AI generated? If a human writes it then has AI improve/fix it, does that count?

How do you tell which is the case?

If we don't allow AI help at all, is that perhaps discriminating against those who don't feel comfortable posting with imperfect English?

I agree in principle, but am concerned in implementation... I'm not sure we can be fair without high risk of discrimination

Edit: typo fix

Edit: or am I AI?! And making edits looks more legit.... (To be clear: I'm not, I play by rules)

▲

fuckaiwriter 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Tell them to post in imperfect English. It is much better than AI elephant turd garbage

	▲	minimaxir 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		AI written comments have been more constructive than what you have been commenting thus far in this post.

▲

stackghost 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>increasingly I lean towards communities where that is a given for any legitimate shares.

I have a hard time finding these communities

	▲	dawnerd 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Mastodon, but the hard part is discovery for sure.