| ▲ | hingler36 6 hours ago |
| This is interesting analysis, but I don't think it necessarily counteracts what the book is saying. To build state-affiliated housing also involved "clearing the pipes" as the article put it. Additionally, the Vienna housing that this article touched on is a way deeper rabbit hole that is absolutely worth looking into. They have a completely different housing paradigm than pretty much anywhere else in the world. |
|
| ▲ | tptacek 6 hours ago | parent [-] |
| (For the uninitiated, the government [and sponsored co-ops] owns almost half the housing in Vienna, and eligibility for social housing, which is seen as desirable, extends deep into the middle class.) |
| |
| ▲ | shay_ker 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There's no free lunch. Housing costs are effectively carried by immigrants and transplants: https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Setting-the-r... In general, the Vienna model is very difficult to copy without being in extreme conditions: https://www.threads.com/@__smiz/post/Cxpz28CIkT6 | | |
| ▲ | Plasmoid 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Many people also don't know that Vienna was isolated and divided for nearly 50 years during the cold war. A significant amount of the available housing is due to Vienna having a bad economy for almost a century. | | |
| |
| ▲ | darkwizard42 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Is this similar to Singapore where much of the housing stock is government housing? | | |
| ▲ | Terr_ 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I am also reminded of (former-?) rival Hong Kong, where the government either runs or subsidizes at least half the housing. (This in turn relies on other idiosyncrasies, like the government owning all the land, a massive sovereign-wealth fund, etc.) |
|
|