| ▲ | kalehmann 9 hours ago | |
Not sure if I see a bad thing in this. I'd like too know what old friends are currently up to and checking their social media has been a way to do so during the golden age of facebook. Lately I feel more value in connecting with them personally, talking and letting them now, that I am still interested in what's going on for them. | ||
| ▲ | AndrewDucker 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
That's great if you're cultivating a very small group of friends who are local. Social media is how I keep vaguely aware of what's going on with my friends who now live scattered across the planet and get to see in person once per decade or so. | ||
| ▲ | brunoarueira 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Yeah, I couldn't agree more. At the very least, it should be used occasionally to post things as a kind of "public memory," not to expose your entire life just for likes and exhibitionism. | ||
| ▲ | netsharc 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I wonder what would happen if: if I post 2 pieces of content, my friend would have to comment on the first one to see the next one. I suppose the app will then mostly be full of throwaway comments in the form of "Cool" or "Wow". But maybe add a modifier that if the poster doesn't have any meaningful reply to a commenter's (let's name him Elon) comment, then the poster's next content will not be shared with Elon next time. | ||