I still exclusively write my code. The quality is higher. I know exactly how it works. It’s more extensible. You don’t have to generate it.

In fact, not many people know that these days, but a human doing a thing by bashing their head against it, often tends to improve. My hand-written code is my best yet. My breadth of knowledge, wider than ever.

But the attraction of LLM code is not that you get quality.

The selling point is that you know have a quality Vs time tradeoff that is a lot better than you used to have.

I can spend 10 seconds typing out a prompt that will generate ok code.

Before a couple of years ago, it might have taken me an hour to type out and debug that code.

In fact, it's better not to generate it imo. Like you said the quality is higher, and by the time I get done reviewing the LLM's output I haven't really saved time over just doing it myself. LLMs are only useful for things you can verify extremely quickly (like a short script), or for things where you don't care about the quality.