| ▲ | skybrian 6 hours ago | |||||||
Businesses are usually allowed to refuse service: "Sorry, we're closed" or "sir, this is a Wendy's." There's nothing dystopian about that. But it's a rather annoying service if the customer can't predict in advance what sort of tasks they're willing to take on. You should have some idea about what they're normally willing to do for you. | ||||||||
| ▲ | nolok 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I do not disagree with business deciding to only provide the service they want, I am not talking about the AI business themselves, I am thinking about the people who think we should remove pages from knowledge book. Whether the book takes the form of an llm or an online website or a printed book is merely implementation details. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ronsor 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I think no one objects to the refusals in the abstract but rather to the inconsistencies and the presentation. You don't know what request might be refused or downgraded. You do know that the marketing copy and CEO's words present it as being for your own good (or the good of society) instead of plainly stated as a business policy based on business or personal concerns. These aspects are what make it grating and yes, potentially dystopian. | ||||||||
| ▲ | vkou 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
> There's nothing dystopian about that. It'll be dystopian when that'll become your only source of information, and we're working on getting there. If you want to be horrified, look at what students (in school and post-secondary) are doing these days. It's insane to offload your thinking and knowledge to a machine owned by other people, but you have to if you want to keep up with the rat race. | ||||||||
| ||||||||