| ▲ | antonymoose an hour ago | ||||||||||||||||
I can love you and still disagree with the things you do and not endorse them. These are not in conflict. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dpark an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This claim hinges on the idea that homosexuality is a thing you do and not a part of who you are. You can love someone while hating a thing they do. You cannot love someone while hating who they are. The conservative Christian notion that homosexuality is a choice to is honestly super weird to me because I certainly never chose heterosexuality. It’s one of those things that only makes sense while you’re in it and it’s constantly being beat into you, and with some distance you see that it’s ridiculous. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wizzwizz4 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Oftentimes, they are in conflict. "I love you, my Samaritan neighbour: but I disagree with your practice of sacrificing to God upon the altar at Mount Gerizim, as opposed to the altar at Temple Mount, as is right and proper; and your copy of scripture differs from mine at thousands of points, for which I condemn yours as erroneous and heretical; and I disagree with your practice of speaking the Name on holy days, for we lost that tradition with our priesthood at the destruction of the Second Temple, and therefore you must also discard the practice, for those who speak the Name have no part in the world to come; and really I'd rather you stopped being a Samaritan altogether." Does that sound like love, to you? | |||||||||||||||||