| ▲ | mmooss 2 hours ago | |
Interesting - what is that based on? He's not some incidental commentator. He's an engineer and a principle force behind this technology. He is responsible for the outcomes - 'I didn't know' is reckless negligence. And if there were clear acute problems, chronic problems weren't hard to guess at for anyone, much less an engineer, with all those resources, working on it for years. | ||
| ▲ | sysguest 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |
> engineer and a principle force behind this technology well he's not some biochemist... and even biochemists have trouble within their own field because there's so much 'unknown' stuff in biochem (eg Thalidomide scandal) | ||