Remix.run Logo
warumdarum an hour ago

So wouldnt it make sense to give up on the protect a disneyland of nature idea, and genemodify the rainforrest to adapt to heat? Fast forward around die off,adaption,recovery?

dullcrisp an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I only buy certified organic non-GMO rainforest, so save a patch for me before you burn the rest of it down and replace it with a monocrop.

42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
deepvibrations 40 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Not sure more meddling with nature is the best idea given our past history of it. There is a good chance you fix one problem and create 10 more!

spwa4 14 minutes ago | parent [-]

The only meddling with nature that went horribly is repeatedly introducing invasive species, then seeing the result after a short time.

And the part that isn't discussed at all, of course, is that that happens all the time in nature.

Of course the solution to climate change is humanity taking control of the climate. But the problem with that is equally simple: warming is inconvenient, but generally helps everyone. Cooling, on the other hand, ... or even merely stopping the warming.

For example, if you started cooling the Ganges valley, it loses about 92% of it's water supply 1 or 2 years after the temperature stops rising (because it's glacial meltwater). That's a billion people, including the entire country of Bangladesh that will be moving. And when it comes to a moving date, to these people, tomorrow (as in never) will always look better than any possible agreement.