> Separate question, separate table. This is our standard latency harness (three short prompts, five reps, 400-token cap), not the build tasks. tok/s is output tokens over wall-clock, uniform for all.

> so their tok/s is a ceiling, not a true decode rate. The clear read: the GPT-5.6 tiers are the snappiest models here on short prompts (Luna answers in about a second), Qwen is absurdly cheap and fast, and DeepSeek and GLM are the slowpokes

You put in a lot of good work, and kudos for that, but man, reading paragraphs like these just puts me off of the entire piece.

Like…how hard would it have been really to type these two sentences by hand, in your own natural voice?

▲

fluidcruft 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, I can't figure out where this "voice" comes from and it is so impossible to get rid of. It is so grating.

	▲	jaggederest 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		You can suggest a different one and it works pretty well, the bar is very low. I asked for hemingway in a planning document one time and the result was highly amusing to everyone. "We will not wreck it with small greeds." was an all time favorite for me.
	▲	Chu4eeno 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		The problem is that everyone (well, too many) is now using the same "voice" when writing. So no matter how good or thoughtful the writing is it gets tiresome.
	▲	zeven7 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Man invents text generation machine. Man generates text.
	▲	sublinear 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It's the unholy trinity of pundits, marketing, and HR. Their writing was already painted into this corner long before the LLM epoch and they continue to publish more than anyone else.

▲

razighter777 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's so telling and offputting.

Please write like a normal human and put the effort in to type what you want to say. Using AI to make your writing is not only lazy, it's bland, tiresome, and disrespectful of the reader's time.

	▲	2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

TrackerFF an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For the arguments sake: What if that is the authors natural voice?

▲

stickfigure 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Eh? I write that way sometimes. Long before LLMs.

I'm sick and tired of reading comments like these.

▲

jakubmazanec 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

> how hard would it have been really to type these two sentences by hand, in your own natural voice

On the other hand, do we have to complain about every seemingly AI written text?

	▲	paxys 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Yes? AI generated text is explicitly disallowed on HN, so it’s not crazy to expect that a similar standard be used for linked content.
	▲	fluidcruft 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		It is just horrible writing style. It doesn't particularly matter that AI wrote it.