Hmm, if you read his previous blog posts pre-ai the tone is not much different. I hate the idea that this dude may just sound like AI at this point by accident.

It somewhat boggles my mind that there are an incredible number of persistent, useless, and annoying comments on here every day accusing any and every article of being AI slop.

AI is a machine that generates content that is supposed to be statistically identical to the content that it was trained on, and it's trained on the content posted here.

The content here will look like AI generated content, and the AI generated content will look like the content here. By fucking definition.

---

Instead we get a bunch of pseudo-intellectual, hokey about how "my AI radar is perfect!" and "I can always spot it because of [insert bullshit about detecting style that's semantically the same as the pre-existing stuff]".

It's just... exhausting.

Yes - there is a lot of AI content on here. Just like there were a bunch of (and still are) under whelming marketing articles on here. Just like there's STILL a bunch of interesting and engaging articles (some of them even written by AI!).

Just vote based on the content and move on with your lives.

People out here wasting time and energy on trying to burn witches. If you want a "sure-fire" AI free experience... Go talk to a real person, in person. Otherwise...

It's almost as if AI trained on the writings of real people.

Note to poszlem before your message is flagged and disappears:

>"We are highly confident this text was AI generated"

And now you're the one literally posting AI generated content, confidently hallucinating that it can detect AI generated content, to hacker news.

Physician, cure thyself.

"We are highly confident this text was AI generated" from gptzero, which is not perfect but is pretty spot on quite often. Just another small hint.

I put his older blog posts there: "We are highly confident this text is entirely human"