|
| ▲ | hypercube33 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| What I don't get is where is the Mac Mini Neo at like $350? Neos tiny motherboard in a box with some more ports would be awesome. |
| |
| ▲ | officeplant 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | With how apple seemed to be caught by surprise when it came to Macbook Neo demand, I'm not sure they have the quantities of SoC's around to handle the demand a Mini Neo could drive. Especially if they could do it for $299. | |
| ▲ | runako 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I will go out on a limb and say that's not going to be an Apple product, period. It doesn't fit anywhere in the value envelope. The relevant questions here are: will the person using this machine also conceivably be wearing a pair of $549 AirPod Max? Or a $399 base Apple Watch? Does that person expect to pay more or less for their largest-screen computing device than their headphones? Framing that way points toward a $350 price point being a laptop for young children (younger than Apple Watch age, so lower elementary). That's a whole different software experience beyond just the hardware. | |
| ▲ | robotresearcher an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Apart from the ports, that’s roughly the AppleTV hardware. A macOS or Linux port to that would be a cute thin client. Not gonna happen, but cute. | |
| ▲ | api 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | A Pi running macOS more or less. Not dissing it though. Killer machine for those who don’t need a lot of power locally. Also a great kiosk for some things. |
|
|
| ▲ | moduspol 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's anecdotal but the kind of people I know that bought Mac Minis for this purpose are what I'd call "light techies." They definitely know how to use an iPhone or a Mac but would struggle on the CLI of a Linux box. Anyone who wanted the OpenClaw use case that is comfortable with Linux probably already has several Linux machines (including a few Raspberry Pis) on-hand. |
|
| ▲ | ramijames 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| And configuring a bot for Telegram is incredibly easy. |
|
| ▲ | xienze 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| > Is it a lack of knowledge from the users or do they really value iMessage integration that much? My understanding is that the barrier to entry to using iMessage makes iMessage a LOT more secure from spam. If you want to do mass iMessages you have to register as a business with Apple, go through all sorts of checks and attestations, etc. At any rate, iMessages are a lot more trustworthy than SMS. So being able to spam people via iMessage is very desirable. I recall a few months ago a guy posting his little spam-iMessage-as-a-Service product here on HN. You could build your little iMessage spam army using a bunch of Mac Minis... |
