The fact that they already extended subscription Fable once would suggest it won’t be solely locked behind API next week, but at the same time it really does look like they are doing everything they can to avoid serving it continuously at scale.

Knowing Anthropic, this unfortunately might end up meaning a quietly quantized Fable on subscription.

▲

wild_egg an hour ago | parent [-]

Can anyone explain this "quietly quantized" model idea to me from a business perspective?

Coca-Cola doesn't "quietly water down" its product to save a few bucks. They know people will take a sip, say "oh that's not what i wanted", and go buy a Pepsi.

If they serve me a quantized Fable, I'm just going to think Fable sucks and go get my tokens elsewhere. What's the point?

	▲	ValentineC 25 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> Coca-Cola doesn't "quietly water down" its product to save a few bucks. They know people will take a sip, say "oh that's not what i wanted", and go buy a Pepsi. Coca-Cola is also mostly measurable and reverse-engineerable. The Claude models are black boxes, and actively curtail distilling efforts.
	▲	petesergeant 39 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Pepsi may not water down its product, but your local diner may well decide to put a little less ice-cream in its milkshakes if it thinks it can get away with it and most people won't be able to tell.