| ▲ | klaxce 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||
Pi makes you think about what you’re doing with it on purpose. This defeats that, as the Mario quote on the page says, and therefore isn’t worth using. People really need to try out “less is more”. The new models are quite smart, so suffocating their context with dozens of MCPs and skills isn’t necessary like it used to be. A cli tool with good built in help and good errors is amazingly easy for the model to figure out. If Pi is too minimal for you and you don’t want to dig into it, OpenCode is pretty good out of the box. I use it for general work I haven’t setup Pi for. The only thing I add to OpenCode is some commands that are shortcuts to save me typing frequent prompts, and a subagent with a fixed model for implementing changes. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | knuckleheads 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Would you say the same about something like, say, Spacemacs? | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | surgical_fire 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
I like the Pi approach, but I think I didn't "hold it correctly" so to say. I would like to migrate away from Claude Code and use Pi as my "peimary" harness. I really like in particular how it manages conversation trees and branches. But I think I didn't do a good job in customizing it for my work. While nothing dramatic, I think the LLM I was using did a better job on Claude Code than on Pi a couple of time when I tried giving it the same work. I was not sure how to improve on it though. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||