| ▲ | forlorn_mammoth 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> Technology has advanced enough that analog clocks have joined polaroid cameras and vinyl records assumption digital 'more advanced' than analog. unclear. How digital more 'advanced'? Is regression, not advance. Analog watch. See gap between minute hand and start of meeting. See gap get smaller. Instant. Colleague in different time zone? See hour hand -3 steps, faster than "14 - 3 is 11". If digital even have 24 hr time, many no. Teach kids. Analog visible, easy to read, child can see. Child can turn hands on wooden clock, manipulate. Now plus 1 hour, now plus 1.5 hours. Move long hand forward 1 rotation, 1.5 rotations. Digital? Teach kids "now plus 90 minutes" digital? Hard math. now plus 90 is now (hour) plus 1 and now (minute) plus 30. Teach kids "now minus 10". Does hour change? Why hour change? why now hour different from now minute? daddy daddy what about now seconds? All abstract, cannot touch. Daddy why move hour number first? Digital. 1 on microwave less than 99. Where else in world 1 < 99 makes sense? Digital time math crazy. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | craftkiller 2 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The technology I was thinking of was digital screens. Analog clocks made sense when the best you could do was attach some arrows to some gears on a rotating shaft. Now we can individually toggle lights in a grid containing millions of lights. > Digital. 1 on microwave less than 99. Where else in world 1 < 99 makes sense? Digital time math crazy. Everywhere? 1 is always less than 99 everywhere. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||