| ▲ | Wingy 4 hours ago |
| Does this mean the negative leap second isn't happening anymore? |
|
| ▲ | linux2647 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Not anymore forever. We’re just not adding one for this year. We might need one next year, we might not. It all depends on the Earth’s rotation and orbit |
| |
| ▲ | NooneAtAll3 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | and Earth's rotation was too fast for last several years we were all waiting for the negative leap second to finally happen - but cowards got too afraid | | |
| ▲ | deathanatos an hour ago | parent [-] | | I don't think it's cowardice, is it? The graph at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second seems to indicate that adding a negative leap second at this point in time would be improper. (We're ~+0.1s off, and a negative leap second would occur if the line was approaching +0.6s. I'd like one too just for the curiosity of the thing, but … the Earth isn't having it.) |
| |
| ▲ | 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [deleted] |
|
|
| ▲ | tedd4u 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| There's an opportunity to insert or remove a leap second twice a year. They only decide about 6 months in advance of each opportunity what to do (leap second, skipped second, or do nothing). |