| ▲ | Tiberium 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
The pricing is insane: $1.25/$4.5 for 1M tokens, and $0.15 for cached input! https://dev.meta.ai/docs/getting-started/pricing-rate-limits | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mchusma an hour ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Yeah, this is most directly comparable to xAI Grok 4.5. In both cases, directionally "opus level intelligence for haiku prices" which is a really big deal for application developers who want to include models like this in their applications. I have been testing switching out haiku and sonnet for Grok 4.5, and may give this a try too (it is quite a bit cheaper, particularly for cached). | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ignoramous 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Cheaper than Qwen 3.7 Max. Second indication, after Grok 4.5 ($2 in / $6 out), that the BigLabs are feeling the GLM 5.2 heat. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fallingbananna 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Meta isn’t right now on the radar for most folks picking models. If they have a really good model, it makes sense to subsidise it, to gain users, before they align prices with competitors. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ai_fry_ur_brain 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
This is still ridiculously expensive imagine having to pay $10 for 100 search results on Google, thats essentially what this is. I really dont see how anyone's willing spend more than $1.50 per mm output. Let alone $15-50. Does anyone actually pay for usage based billing as a consumer? | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||