How is the performance compared to regular PostgreSQL?

I know it says it is not performance optimized yet, but if this succeeds, will it only bring more "memory safety" or is there a serious performance gain as well?

▲ orphea 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

  will it only bring more "memory safety" or is there a serious performance gain as well?

The project will die in a couple of days or weeks. You're making a mistake if you're seriously consider using this in any capacity.

	▲	rhogan 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I also suspect this will die very shortly, which is a real shame, not because it will be beneficial but because of the time and tokens needlessly spent on something that will be thrown out.
	▲	emilsedgh 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Maybe it will, but having a performance comparison will be very interesting nontheless.

▲ malisper an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

The version in the GitHub repo is ~8x slower than Postgres. I have a new unpublished version that is 50% faster than Postgres on transactional workloads and ~300x faster on analytical workloads.