> Why jump on the opportunity to prune reading by rejecting the lot as soon an unrelated premise you disagree with is presented?

Ars Technica has already trashed its reputation with the infamous controversy over publishing AI hallucinated quotations.

I couldn't decide whether the opening sentence of the submitted article was so dumb that it had to be written by AI or so dumb that it had to be written by a human, and coming to a conclusion on that question didn't seem worth it.

> you could churn the entire article through AI to summarize it

I don't do AI summaries, ever.