| ▲ | lifthrasiir 5 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Claude Code is entirely vibe-coded for a long time. Bun isn't. You go read and compare the actual Bun code; it reads reasonably well [1]. [1] For example, as a random sample, https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/bun-v1.3.14/src/css/medi... -> https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/blob/4924862cffbf671792d47c92... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | silver_silver 5 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sure, reasonably well at first glance, but to quote the article: > I rewrote Bun in Rust using about 50 dynamic workflows in Claude Code run continuously over the course of 11 days. > Excluding comments, Bun is 535,496 lines of Zig. > How do you review a PR with +1 million lines added? How do you start to build the confidence needed to responsibly merge large quantities of LLM-authored code? A language-independent test suite with a million assertions, adversarial code review and when something does go wrong, fixing the process that generates the code instead of hand-fixing the code. That’s vibe coding. This blog post is an ad for Claude, nothing more. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||