Remix.run Logo
dzonga 6 hours ago

I don't know if I should feel sad or laugh at the pain at the same time lol.

what a wonderful way to reflect reality for a good population of devs.

you can hack the game i.e real life

1. live in a cheaper location 2. do things that don't scale & do the ugly work

that naturally extends your runway, you don't need to apply to YC

remember the median Pay in the US - is 61800 based on ADP the largest payroll provider.

so before aiming for millions aim for 85K. yeah a far cry from the FAANG wage - but one - you will never get laid off.

85K - you can live everywhere besides the coastal US cities comfortably.

aliteraryhigh 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The last 2 statements are so far from reality it's insane. I live in the south/the midwest (depending on who you ask) in an okay-sized city, I was a SWE making $85k/year gross and struggling to cover housing and bills, and I got laid off when the company "eliminated my position".

chirau 4 hours ago | parent [-]

How much was/is your rent per month? And how many dependents?

jambalaya8 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I remember taking pay cuts of 35-65% for a few jobs I thought sounded more cool or less stressful when I was younger, only to find out some of my coworkers were making far more at the same place. They placed me still at or above the median wage, and I learned a lot (I never vested, and stocks weren't a factor in the jobs).

In my personal experience, the jobs I have taken which paid less treated me as cheaper and more disposable. This is not to say all companies are like this, and indeed many do value tech employees they could not afford otherwise more, but making a blanket statement about any pay figure is sort of a bad idea.

The FAANG workplace environment is something you will pay for. There are reasons it pays well, and I never really understood this until I left. I do not mean merely 'doing your job'.

As for the last part of your reply, I am guessing it was meant to get reactionary replies (touché).

vjvjvjvjghv 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

“ In my personal experience, the jobs I have taken which paid less treated me as cheaper and more disposable. ”

That’s my experience. The more I have made in my career, the better and with more respect I got treated. As freelance I did some projects with non profit “do gooders”. They didn’t pay well and treated people horribly. On the other hand, successful companies will treat you well and pay well.

nixon_why69 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Is it possible that the causation is the other way? FAANG doesn't pay well because its dispiriting and toxic, its toxic because it pays well. This attracts all sorts of behavior.

I mean, it paid well in the early-mid 2010s also and was way less toxic.

jakevoytko 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Out of curiosity, what has changed over time that has made it more toxic? I left Google in 2015.

It certainly had its share of toxic traits, but it was at the "what place doesn't?" level.

nixon_why69 3 minutes ago | parent [-]

My feeling was multiple generations of optimizing for promo packets had made the entire culture cynical at G and Amazon. It's one thing when people give lip service to the right things but sometimes the wrong things are rewarded. It hits another level when leaders are actively coaching and advocating cynicism. Throw in layoff fear on top of that and now it's a political mess.

Hydraulix989 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've found that when I was making $85k I was just as miserable as when I was making $200k+ at FAANG, just without the money. The corporate politics and shittiness of being an employee were the exact same. At least, I was living in a VHCOL city.

azinman2 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Unless you have a family, want to travel, want an ample retirement fund, have complex health issues, etc etc.

hirvi74 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Not entirely true. I work in "boring" State government as a programmer. I constantly see juniors starting private industry jobs at close to what I make after being with my employer for 10 years straight.

However, money is not everything to me. While the salary is not truly impressive, my job has a lot of benefits. People sleep on these jobs while chasing MegaCorp clout which is cool and all, but I am just a redneck clever enough to write bad code. I don't want FAANG, and FAANG doesn't want me.

> Unless you have a family, want to travel

We have generous PTO, sick leave, bereavement leave, 6 weeks of paternity leave for mothers AND fathers, 16 holidays off, etc.. Plus, many offices are 100% remote (mine is 3/5 days a week).

> want an ample retirement fund

I have a Pension, 401k, and a 457(b) all through my employer. I am fortunate that the pension is also fully funded for over 30 years in advance. Plus, PTO rolls into sick time annual and sick time can be used to purchase service time, thus one can retire even faster than the typical 30 year timeframe.

> have complex health issues

We have great health insurance plans, and my office has been wonderful in dealing with people with very complex health issues. Way more than what I expect the private industry would do.

Guess how many people have been laid off from my office? ;)

boredatoms 16 minutes ago | parent [-]

Its fairly simple to do the math and see that outside faang a few mill is being left on the table every 5-10 years

OhSoHumble 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It actually really hurt when I pulled up the page. It's why I'm trying to bootstrap my own software company off of my savings.

I'm aiming for 85k (or there abouts) after a few years of earning nothing. But I can't help but feel like a failure because distribution and convincing people to use my software is extremely difficult. I don't want to go back to the tech industry but at the same time I don't know if I have it in me to go "yeah, I'm still working on my <insert dream here> but I have 0 - 10 users" for the next few years.

thejazzman 2 hours ago | parent [-]

solidarity; i'm right there with you.

MeetingsBrowser 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> 85K - you can live everywhere besides the coastal US cities comfortably.

This is far from true. There are plenty of expensive places to live away from the coasts

daemonologist 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Only if you seek them out (ski resorts and such). I've lived in both of the most expensive major inland cities (Chicago and Denver) and $85k is plenty in both, even for a small family.

api 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Honestly these days even the MCOL (medium cost of living) interior cities like Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Columbus, Charlotte, etc. would be tight on 85K especially with any dependents.

Our family lived in HCOL places like Boston and LA before returning to Cincinnati a few years ago. It’s still cheaper than those but wow… I remember it being a lot cheaper when I left. Since we returned it’s gone up even more. Some neighborhoods went up by as much as 25% in the last 5 years and are not coming down.

I’ve been convinced for years that the inflation numbers are cooked. Or at least “massaged.” I don’t understand how people with only near median salaries live. It’s amazing there aren’t riots.

hattmall 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

And yet, the majority of people in those cities make less than that amount. Like Charlotte the median HOUSEHOLD income is $82K. Median wage is ~$53k. As someone making below the median, I don't understand how people are making so much more money and not feeling rich. We have house, boat, golf carts, kids in private school, decent cars, take multiple vacations. We didn't even get lucky and buy cheap housing with low interest, our interest rate is 7.5%. We certainly aren't stacking lots of savings and sometimes have to juggle bills, but we have a lot going on and aren't even making the median right now. But once you drop much below our level, if you don't own anything you actually get a lot of assistance.

senordevnyc 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

How many kids did you have when making $85k in Denver?

gdhvkkk 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Just as important is when.

In 2000, very possible

In 2010, probable

In 2026, unlikely

5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
myk9001 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> 1. live in a cheaper location 2. do things that don't scale & do the ugly work

From the creators of how to draw the owl, lol!

20after4 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Cost of living has risen dramatically everywhere. Unless you live in a small town in a poor state like I do then 85K sounds pretty bad. That's barely above the poverty line at this point.

hirvi74 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I do not make a ton more than that, and I live in the downtown area of the largest city in my southern state. I still am able to save about 30%-40% of my gross income every year, pay my bills, etc..

I think too many people just have poor spending habits (or children).

3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
overgard 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wish. I live in the midwest in a stable but unsexy city (probably around like 50th biggest in the nation? So recognizable but not particularly major). 85k is pretty painful here.

vkou 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> so before aiming for millions aim for 85K. yeah a far cry from the FAANG wage - but one - you will never get laid off.

People making 85K absolutely get laid off.

daemonologist 5 hours ago | parent [-]

I think they're saying that you should build a small business which nets you 85k, not find an employer that underpays you.

(Whether this makes you more resistant to being "fired" is still up for debate of course.)

jambalaya8 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Small businesses have difficulties all the time.

OhSoHumble 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah.

"The market" lays you off - or heavily reduces your salary.

stbtrax 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

1 is not an option for a lot of us in geographically tied roles that are infrequently fully remote

UncleOxidant 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> you will never get laid off.

Please explain this assertion.

hattmall 30 minutes ago | parent [-]

If you work in industry, at a place that pays developers $85K, you are very unlikely to be part of some sort of downsizing. This is entrenched company territory and the kind of place that just goes about it's business, not trying to hang the moon or "ramp up" areas. Yeah they can be subject to wider economic influences, but at tech companies layoffs happen just because of a change in the wind while profits are breaking records.

Like there's a place near me, I don't even think they would pay $85K though. Maybe for higher positions, but closer to $70k. They are pretty much always hiring lots of IT positions. They make firetrucks and pretty much only sell them regionally, but are set with orders for like 25+ years. Their low skill positions fill up fast though.

5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
cuttothechase 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The funny thing is that this is not a linear relationship.

It is not like ah.. there is my 85K job or 150K job and now I will never get fired or laid off.,

Late stage capitalism will find its way to make it more efficient at 85K level or at 1.5M level. Pick your red/blue pill.