The article has no responsibility of explaining to you why PFAS is harmful, considering its harms are well established in science over many years. Your denialism and ignorance of the harms of PFAS is a malicious attempt to discredit the article. I suggest asking your preferred LLM service with access to the web to find you the necessary evidence.

What? How can it possibly talk about the decision without the risks? It doesn’t even refer to a source where I can learn more.

Did you ask the LLM about your claim that no level was safe?